The time is NOW

We need to put the pedal to the metal: Adaptation Futures 2018

From the sunny, sandy shores of my island home to the drought-stricken city of Cape Town and I found myself nerding out for five days at the Adaptation Futures 2018 conference (where in the world will this PhD journey take me next?).

My two key takeaways from this conference are that the climate change adaptation (CCA) community is not moving fast enough for the impending 1.5 degrees increase and beyond and that we need to remember that climate change is about human experience.  What effective, inclusive, context-specific, systematic, human-centered and transformative CCA looks like is still a little unclear – but I have a ton of new ideas and approaches to mentally process and see how they all fit into the picture for Vanuatu.

Before I get on to the amazing experience that was Adaptation Futures 2018 (#nerdalert) I feel compelled to highlight my one major critique of the week: the stark irony of the ‘whiteness’ of attendees – a crude way of expressing that the majority of participants seemed to be from developed countries; fairly ironic given that this bunch of ‘international experts’ (myself included) spent the week discussing community engagement, the need to understand the perspectives, priorities and worldviews of local people, the use of traditional knowledge in CCA and ‘locally-appropriate’ solutions without the presence and engagement of local people!  There was some representation from some African countries, including community members and small-scale farmers, which was great but a very limited presence from the Asia-Pacific.  I did not meet, or see a presentation of, one Pacific Islander in the 5 days of the conference (there was over 1000 attendees so I definitely could have missed them).   Yes it’s expensive to fly to South Africa from the Pacific and then the cost of accommodation and food (I know firsthand from self-funding a big portion of my trip) but I am quite sure the majority of international experts did not pay their own way…so why not fund representatives of the countries that we’re discussing….just an idea…

Ok but on to the good stuff.  I learned so much at this conference – I was inspired and challenged, my understanding of CCA broadened and I’m still grappling with how to put it all together in practice (and in my thesis!).  I’m not a big fan of ‘networking’ but I really enjoyed meeting all these interesting people who are as passionate about the work they do as I am and are not just colleagues but new friends.

Conference dinner
A little downtime and making friends at the conference dinner

Some key messages from AF2018 (aside from ‘hurry the F up’):

  1. Local priorities and perspectives are fundamental (this is not new). We need to acknowledge the western knowledge systems and the traditional knowledge and “weave them together rather than trying to integrate them”. We need to take a closer look at how we value knowledge and how our understandings of climate change and adaptation options are built from our worldview – which may or may not be the most useful way of looking at things.
  2. Financing remains a struggle – there are options out there but they are onerous and targeted.
  3. It’s meaningless to build climate change resilience while ignoring underlying social issues and power structures that increase vulnerability and undermine that very resilience. Climate change can be seen as an opportunity to motivate transformative change.

Some more food for thought….:

  • The Urban Farming Policy in Indonesia successfully integrated voices from the community – risks and solutions identified at community level – into policy. It can be done!
  • How do resilience and wellbeing complement each other and how do they undermine each other? What does wellbeing mean? How can we better consider wellbeing (and should we) in resilience, and other, approaches to CCA?  (My opinion is yes – wellbeing should be the overall goal and it’s important to remember how subjective it is).
  • Daniel Morchain from Oxfam delved into the framing of CCA and the importance of knowledge and power. Is ‘non-expert’ knowledge (eg. traditional knowledge) valued less?  The CCA agenda has been developed and dominated by developed Westernized countries from the beginning – how does limit community empowerment and locally-relevant approaches?
Food systems
One of my community workshops on food systems mapping in Vanuatu – is this kind of work enough to really bring local voices to the fore or are we just perpetuating our worldview through the methods that we use in research…?

Overall, we need to “challenge the status quo” and “disrupt our old ways of thinking”.  In this reframing of CCA can we move from a place of doom and gloom and see change as liberatory – an opportunity to improve the current situation (this is heavily drawn from/inspired by Daniel Morchain’s presentation).

I think that for a PhD student, and even for practitioners, a conference like this one is not just important for sharing ideas, lessons learned, new and innovative approaches but also to take you out of your little bubble, remind you why you’re doing what you’re doing and re-igniting that passion that got you started in the first place.  So, it is time to step up our game and make some meaningful headway in the ability to adapt to what is coming while continuing to work towards that optimistic (utopian?) goal of making the world a better place for all.

But before that….some much needed R&R – nature, camping, rock climbing and chill vibes….you can find me in the mountains.

AF2018 Presentation
I did have a cheeky little presentation of my own there too…

The art of procrastination.

Now I would describe myself as quite self-motivated and disciplined (as would many of my friends and family I think) and going into my PhD I was not too concerned about falling into that classic PhD stereotype of withering away all this ‘unsupervised’ time until you realise that you have only 6 months left to write an 80,000 word thesis…but….I have to admit that I have spent more time procrastinating than I imagined.

There are some more positive forms of procrastination that I engage in – yoga, meditation, laundry – but for the most part its Netflix, Youtube rock climbing videos or lots of stress-snacking.  Oh and, of course, mindless social media scrolling.  The ironic part is that generally you don’t enjoy your procrastination activity because you feel guilty that you should be working.

So here’s my top 5 tips for beating that procrastination trap:

  1. Pomodoro it up! Download an app (I use Focus Keeper but there’s a bunch out there) and use the small intervals as an easier way to get motivated and then you don’t even have to feel guilty about the reward breaks. You may even find it’s all you need to get into a writing flow and you don’t need all the set breaks.
  2. Start small. I often start by re-reading and editing what I’ve already done and before I realise it I’m in the swing of things. Also, just write– anything – the first draft does not need to be polished.  Just beginning to write full sentences with ideas and structure and then later you can refine it, add in references and restructure as needed.  I find just getting stuff down on paper really helps to get past the initial writer’s block.
  3. Meditation. This one is really key for me.  It really helps me clear the mind and calm my nervous system which allows new ideas to flow.  I often find that I’ll think of a bunch of things I want to write, or how to restructure a paper, or re-frame something I’ve been struggling with when I’m meditating.  My personal preference is not to interrupt my meditation session – when I think of something I trust that I’ll remember at the end of the session and go back to meditating.  Then at the end of my meditation I jump back on my computer and set to work with a clear head and new ideas.
  4. A writing buddy! – I travel a lot for my PhD and so I often work from home or at cafes but it can be pretty solitary (and distracting – with all that tea to be made and laundry to be washed). I have recently experienced the joys of sharing the writing pain with a friend and keeping each other accountable.  Just having a ‘colleague’ working in the same space feels less isolating and ideally it’s another PhD student so you can bounce ideas off each other.  A good way to start could be to check out if there’s a Shut Up and Write chapter in your town. Just be careful not to fall into a dual-procrastination trap – although usually that type of procrastination is more enjoyable than the avoidance techniques employed at home alone.
  5. Exercise – My health is super important to me and I really do my best to prioritise it alongside my PhD. I find it has some similar effects as meditation like clearing the mind, it makes you feel good – you know all those happy hormones that are released, can help improve sleep quality amongst other things. You will be more productive if you’re happy and healthy!

Oh and my cheeky sixth one is – write a blog!  At least you’re writing something and, you know, it’s PhD-related so essentially you’re working (okay this last one is really just to justify what I’m doing right now!).

Now these are not rocket science and I’m sure you’ve heard them all before.  But you’re probably reading a PhD post on procrastination because you’ve already fallen into the P-trap.

Close Google Chrome.  Select from actions 1 – 5 and Go!  Meditation is a good place to start – just find a comfy seat, set your timer, close your eyes and snap out of the procrastination trap..  If you need some tips see my other blog on meditation for PhD sanity.

P.S. But also remember you do need to take real, quality breaks.  You cannot, and should not be expected, to work 24/7 on your PhD.  There really is more to life!


Health: “the human face of climate change”

Vanuatu pikinini
Vanuatu pikinini

I write this as I’m on the plane to Vanuatu (finally after a few false starts) to begin my PhD fieldwork, reflecting on my last few months interning with the Climate Change and Health Team at the World Health Organization (WHO) Headquarters.  There’s so much I could write about that experience but for this post I’m going with more topic-focused musings…

How do we get health on the climate change agenda?

It’s all about funding.   Okay, maybe not all but how can we address the health effects of climate change if funding bodies, especially (but not limited to) climate financing mechanisms, have not yet jumped on the health bandwagon?  The mobilization of resources for climate change and health was a recurring theme throughout my WHO internship and at high-level Pacific regional meetings held in Fiji in March 2018.

Delegates from 18 Pacific Island Countries and Territories, experts and WHO representatives came together in Nadi to develop an action plan for the new Special Initiative: Climate Change and Health (CCH) in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) that Dr Tedros announced in Bonn at COP23 last year (with Arnold Schwarzenegger – a bit of trivia for you) and I was lucky enough to be in the room (in a purely observer capacity).  Pacific SIDS, as most of us are aware, are at the forefront of climate change impacts – we’ve all seen the news stories on sinking islands. The people of these islands are likely to experience (or are already experiencing) a multitude of climate-related health burdens.

Climate change and health?  What?  Many of us (I might even go as far as to say most of us) have never connected climate change and health – if you had asked me two years ago I would admit that it had never crossed my mind.  But climate change is already is affecting health (and this will only amplify into the future) in a myriad of ways; from the mental health issues arising from loss –both human and material – from extreme weather events; to the increased spread of vector-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue due to increasing average temperatures; to (and my personal crusade) increased malnutrition – both under- and over-nutrition – via various pathways including reduced agricultural and fisheries productivity and the exacerbation of a trend away from a traditional diet to a greater reliance on less-healthy imported food products.  Those are just a few of the ways that climate change will affect human health.  So, is increased awareness the key to better funding?  Maybe.  I think it’s definitely a big part of the picture.  But for who, and where, does this awareness need to be raised?

The ideas and recommendations for raising the profile of CCH that stood out for me during the Nadi meeting include:

  • Health representatives are present and active at all important climate change forums, including COP24;
  • We need champions for health. But not just in the health sector.  In fact, we need champions for health in other sectors to drive the agenda forward.  CCH is a cross-sectoral issue (think agriculture and fisheries, climate change and environment (obviously), infrastructure, transportation…and the list goes on).
  • Commitment at the highest levels. We have started to see this with both health and the plight of SIDS mentioned in the Paris Agreement;
  • We do need more evidence because policy makers like it (and it does allow us to plan and implement better responses). But we already have a lot of evidence and research and should draw on what we have.  So far we’ve mostly been looking at health outcome by health outcome – what happens when we put this together; see how they all interact?  There we have a much bigger and more powerful story to tell.

“We’re not preparing for the future.  The future will be different”. – Kristie Ebi, expert CCH.

Dr Joy St John, Assistant Director General for Climate and Other Determinants of Health - ‎World Health Organization
Dr Joy St John, Assistant Director General for Climate and Other Determinants of Health – ‎World Health Organization

Of course, these ideas represent just a limited part of the proceedings of the meetings.  But the overall message is clear – climate change will have significant adverse impacts on health and climate financing must be made more available to CCH initiatives.  I did come away from both my internship and the Nadi meetings very optimistic – it was heartening to see the passion, enthusiasm and commitment of so many highly intelligent, influential and driven people.

For all you ‘non-believers’ out there, I’ll end with one of my favourite quotes from the sessions, spoken again by Kristie Ebi: “Climate change is not a belief system”.  Simple but true.

As usual selfie game is weak but a little behind the scenes action – from Geneva to Nadi…myself and Dr Joy St John

Disclaimer: the views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to the author’s employer, organization, committee or other group or individual.

[1] The title quote, “human face of climate change”, was shared in a presentation at the meetings in Nadi – but I can’t remember who said it for attribution.


The unnecessary reign of ‘the thesis’

As momentous as it will be, I do not think that the submission and approval of my final thesis is the only focus of my PhD – or even the most valuable outcome.  Ultimately, how many people will read your full thesis? Probably your supervisors, the examiners, your mum and a handful of interested academics and students.  If completed by publication, then bits and pieces (the different publications) will likely get a wider readership, but still probably fairly limited. Even if you’re one of those geniuses curing cancer or discovering a new planet I would contend that your headline results will get much more attention than your actual thesis.

In this blog post I’ll share some of my experiences and insights (aka opinions) to approach a PhD as an offering of unique opportunities – both on a personal and professional level – rather than an end-goal of that stress-inducing monster document: the thesis.

Although 3-4 years sometimes seems like a lifetime when working on your thesis, we all know it will be over before you know it and you’ll be back out in the big bad world looking for a real paying job!  If you’ve spent night and day behind your computer, smashing out that thesis (which is certainly tempting when you’re overwhelmed with a never-ending list of things to get done), you may find yourself with a nice piece of work at the end of it but perhaps also you’ll be a shell of a person with no connections for the next step of your career.

Good relationships are everything out in the job-world.  We like to think that we live in a world where merit-based selection reigns supreme (at least in Australia), but in reality people like the familiar.  We remember a friendly face.  We like to work with people we know – someone who we know will do the job well and/or fit in with the organizational culture. (A pleasant workplace with colleagues who make our work easier and more enjoyable is generally ideal).  And a good personal recommendation goes a long way.  So networks are key.

There are many ways that you can step away from your thesis and build not only those essential networks, but other skills and experiences that will make you just that little bit more attractive to an employer.  I was lucky enough to be accepted into UQ’s Global Change Scholars Program, a cohort of about 30 PhD students from diverse disciplines across the university.  As part of this program I have heard a lot of inspiring stuff on a range of topics from climate change and the bleaching of coral reefs to global shifts in economic activity from some pretty impressive people.  The whole group of us were also treated to a week away on Lady Elliott Island, off the coast of Queensland, to learn about sustainability and coral reef management (I wrote a previous blog post you can read here).

And to top it all off, as part of the program, we had the option of doing an internship, which is what I am doing right now, in GENEVA, at the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (yep still pinching myself).  I have three months to gain work experience and meet all the right people at the organization leading the way in climate change and health globally.  This experience will be invaluable to broadening my understanding of my own PhD topic and better setting myself up for a job in this (very small) sector.  I am also meeting a bunch of super interesting people who work at a range of other UN organizations, and beyond, who may become useful connections for the future – or just really good friends! And along the way I get to enjoy a European white Christmas, eat a lot of cheese and French pastries, dance in the snow and sing karaoke at the United Nations Christmas party!



But you don’t necessarily have to seek out formal programs to build relationships and get out of the thesis-zone.  I also regularly have coffee with academics in other schools or universities that are working on similar topics of interest, I co-organize Friday drinks with other PhD students in my school (when I’m there), I often catch-up with old work colleagues and, of course, have a social life. (Stay tuned for a future blog post on tips to get out of that PhD-bubble and create space in your life for other things).   These events are not all coldly strategic and solely to serve my future career (often that can seem forced anyway) –  I also find that meeting new people intellectually-stimulating, broadens my thinking and may even help direct some part of my thesis I’m stuck on, but more importantly – it’s also fun!

So while I will (and have) put in a lot of hours behind a computer writing that 80,000 word monster I will keep my focus on the big picture and take advantage of those amazing opportunities that I wouldn’t be able to in other, more constrained circumstances; I’ll take the time to nurture relationships both strategically with professionals and academics in my industry but also with other students and people I meet along the way; and also actually enjoy having this time to pursue a ‘passion project’ and all that it entails. So, I encourage you to step away from your computer, let your eyes unblur (I’m sure that’s a word!) and see YOUR bigger picture.

Like most things in life – it’s the journey rather than the destination that counts!

IMG_0791 (1)

Localised approach to global challenges: climate change and NCDs in Vanuatu

You know that one time you asked your PhD-student friend what they’re working on and at the end of the conversation you realised you would not be able to explain it to someone else to save yourself?  Perhaps you left the conversation wondering why they’re spending three to four (or five, six or seven!) years studying this one niche thing?  What is the point? Yep I’ve been there.  Sometimes it really is just for lack of a better option or because of some obscure passion.  But often there is a really important point hidden in all that technical-speak.

Communicating research and situating it in the bigger picture, in a way that makes sense to, and resonates with a wider audience is a crucial skill for researchers that is often neglected in lieu of focussing on more academically prestigious journal publications.  Generally, the purpose of research (in my opinion) is, at the very least, to increase an understanding of an issue by answering a burning question (or two), but more importantly to motivate some kind of change – perhaps to affect individual behaviour or, more grandly, to influence policy.  At least that’s what I want to do!

So, here’s why I think my research matters – not just to me, not just for my participants, but as a piece of the puzzle in global change.

Lap lap
ni-Vanuatu woman preparing local laplap

Firstly, my topic: (officially) Impacts of climate change on food and nutrition security and diet-related non-communicable diseases in Vanuatu.  (Try saying that 10 times fast!).

So I’m looking at some ‘wicked’ global problems but at a localised scale.  (You have to start somewhere right!)

Climate change is one of the most important (if not THE most important) global challenge we are facing this century.  Despite the claims of some prominent politicians and leaders (you all know who I’m talking about), the climate science leaves no doubt that climate change is real and that human beings are the most significant driving force[i].  However, it is not just that climate change is happening but it is the rate of change that is unprecedented (and pretty scary).  There are some great youtube videos that explain anthropogenic (caused by human activity) climate change better and more simply than I can, including these two: Climate change (according to a kid) and one by the Conversation.

Some of the effects of climate change we expect to see over the next 10, 20, 50 years include sea level rise, surface and ocean temperature increases, increased rainfall, greater frequency and intensity of extreme events, rising ocean temperature and carbon dioxide levels, amongst other things[ii].   These effects will impact our environment and in turn our society in many (some unforeseeable) ways – but the consensus is they will be, by and large, adverse impacts.

For example, higher sea temperatures mean that our beautiful, life-sustaining coral reefs, that are essential for the health of our underwater ecosystems, will begin to bleach and die.  Oh hang on – that’s happening NOW – all over the world.

The Great Barrier Reef (GBR), for example, experienced TWO, back-to-back, massive coral bleaching events in 2016 and 2017, which saw more than 50% of the reef severely bleached[iii]. These corals are unlikely to be able to recover completely if sea temperatures remain high (or get even warmer) and we continue other reef-damaging practices.  On top of that, Cyclone Debbie, an extreme weather event, resulted in further damage to the GBR, with some areas suffering 97% coral loss[iv]. This is not just a matter of losing beautiful dive and snorkelling sites for future generations (although as a keen scuba diver that makes me very sad), but it disrupts the whole marine ecosystem affecting fish communities and humans that rely on the reefs for food and livelihoods.  Coral bleaching is only one of the many adverse impacts of climate change.

What I find the most disturbing though, is that those of us contributing the most to anthropogenic climate change (with our privileged lifestyles of 24/7 electricity, an average of 1.8 cars per household in Australia[v] and regular plane travel, to name a few things), will not be the first ones to experience the detrimental effects – not by a longshot.  Some developing nations, including small island countries in the Pacific, whose role in global warming is negligible, will experience some of the worse early effects without the resources to adequately manage them.  While there is actually a strong self-serving motive to stop ignoring the problem and start dedicating sufficient resources to it (we will eventually be affected too!), I believe we also have a moral obligation to do something.

If that’s all just a little bit depressing then take a break and watch this.  (I’m not sure if that actually makes things feel better or worse – laughter is always good right?).

But we’re not quite done yet – another critical global challenge is non-communicable diseases (or NCDs).  The four major types of NCDs are cardiovascular disease (eg. heart attacks and strokes), cancers, chronic respiratory diseases (eg. Asthma) and diabetes.  An unhealthy diet is a key risk factor for three out of four of these NCD groups.  The metabolic risk factors for these NCDs include hypertension (high blood pressure), overweight and obesity, hyperglycaemia (high blood glucose) and hyperlipidaemia (high levels of fat in the blood) – all of which are affected by our diet. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 70% of all deaths worldwide can be attributed to NCDs[vi].  In Australia, cardiovascular disease alone accounts for around 30% of all deaths[vii].

Display of kastom dance at a cultural festival on Malekula island

But why Vanuatu?

Aside from the fact that spending an appreciable amount of time in the country resulted in me falling in love with its stunning beaches, turquoise water, diverse landscapes, slow-paced, vibrant and rich culture and lovely people….due to their particular geographical, economic and political-social characteristics, Pacific Island Countries and Territories, including Vanuatu, will be some of the first countries to be severely impacted by climate change.

Vanuatu is considered a Least Developed Country by the OECD and its small population of around 272,000 is spread across 65 islands[viii],[ix]. Approximately 75% of the population live in rural areas relying primarily on subsistence farming and fishing for their food and nutrition security[x].  Vanuatu is ranked the world #1 for natural disaster risk in the WorldRiskIndex which assesses 171 countries’ exposure to natural hazards and their vulnerability[xi]. Additionally, the Pacific is experiencing what has been called an “NCD crisis”, due to increasingly high prevalence rates of these diseases in the region.  Rates of NCDs and NCD risk factors in Vanuatu, while lower than many other Pacific Island Countries, are still significant.  50.9% of the population is overweight and obesity prevalence is 18.8%[xii] compared to global rates of 39% and 13% respectively[xiii].  One study estimates that of premature deaths, 52% for males and 60% for females, result from NCDs, particularly cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer[xiv].  And I could go on.  The burden of NCDs is exacerbated by country’s low-capacity health system and dispersed, rural population, making it particularly challenging to manage.  Additionally, a WHO report found that key stakeholders in Vanuatu identified NCDs as a priority climate change health risk[xv].

How does climate change affect health and, more specifically, NCDs?  Well, that is sort of the point of my research – to get a better idea of the mechanisms so we know where to intervene.  But we already have some theoretical ideas.  Overall, climate change is seen as a “risk multiplier”; exacerbating existing health risks.  Climate change adversely affects health both directly, such heat stroke from rising temperatures or injury from cyclones; and indirectly, such as malnutrition from reduced food and nutrition security or negative mental health impacts[xvi].

A review (not yet published), conducted by myself and colleagues, found four of the main themes around climate change and diet-related NCDs in the Pacific dominated the literature: the adverse effects of climate change on agriculture and fisheries and the consequential impairment in food availability, access and quality; reduced food and nutrition security as a result of climate change-induced migration; and long-term dietary changes following humanitarian disaster response food assistance.  The nexus between climate change, food and nutrition security and diet-related NCDs is still a new area of research, and the impacts are indirect, so there are likely other links not mentioned here.  Also, it is important to remember that the wider socio-economic-political context may exacerbate or mediate the impacts of climate change on food and nutrition security and health.

Local fisherman on Efate island

But really, these are such huge global problems.  What will my small, barely-funded, research project achieve?  Again, it’s important to start somewhere.  There is a lack of research in the Pacific region in general (or research that is well-communicated at least) and the issue of climate change and health is an urgent one.  I aim to add to the evidence base, not only to improve understanding of the issue but to assist in the advocacy of these issues and help to provide a compelling case to drive action.  I intend, by working closely with the Government of Vanuatu, to inform policies and programs in the country that will directly assist local communities with improving their food and nutrition security and health in the face of climate change.  I really hope that I can provide a platform for (some) ni-Vanuatu communities’ stories, concerns and ideas are heard and that their priorities and needs are at the forefront of actions taken to combat these wicked problems in a holistic and locally-acceptable way.

[i] IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.

[ii] IPCC, 2014: as above.

[iii] Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA):

[iv] GBRMPA: As above

[v] Australian Bureau of Statistics:

[vi] World Health Organization:

[vii] World Health Organization:

[viii] OECD: List of ODA Recipients 2014 final.pdf

[ix] Vanuatu National Statistics Office (VNSO):

[x] VNSO: as above

[xi] World Risk Index:

[xii] World Health Organization: http://

[xiii] World Health Organization:

[xiv] Carter, K., Tovu, V., Langati, J. T., Buttsworth, M., Dingley, L., Calo, A., . . . Taylor, R. (2016). Causes of death in Vanuatu. Population Health Metrics, 14(1), 7. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0074-4

[xv] McIver L, Kim R, Hales S, Honda Y, Spickett J, Woodward A. Human Health and Climate Change In Pacific Island Countries. World Health Organization. Manila, Philippines; 2015.

[xvi] McIver L, Kim R, Hales S, Honda Y, Spickett J, Woodward A. Human Health and Climate Change In Pacific Island Countries. World Health Organization. Manila, Philippines; 2015.

#islandlife – turtles, a manta ray, sustainability (and no sun)

I haven’t blogged in awhile….for many reasons (too busy, tired, avoidance) but the last four days have reinvigorated my passion for what I’m doing (and why I’m doing it).

I just spent an internet-free four days on Lady Elliot Island learning about climate change and environmental sustainability (and a whole lotta play thrown in) with a bunch of high-calibre, fascinating people, as part of the Global Change Scholars Program.  While the weather was pretty dismal, the location and the company more than made up for it!

Lady Elliot is a small coral cay that sits on the southern tip of the Great Barrier Reef.  It has its own (grass) airstrip and is home to an eco-resort committed to environmental sustainability.  Until the late 1800s it was covered with bird poo (guano), the mining of which (yes apparently you can mine bird poo) resulted in extensive damage to the island and a complete loss of vegetation.   You wouldn’t even know if you saw it now!

Revegetation, initiated by past lease-owners (the island is leased by the Commonwealth Government), was systematically and extensively advanced when the island management was taken over by the current ‘custodian’, Peter Gash.  We were lucky enough to not only have our flight piloted by Peter but we also heard first-hand about the trials and tribulations of bringing the resort to the level of environmental sustainability that has been achieved.


We were given a fascinating tour of the resort by a staff member (who was obviously very passionate about his work).  The hybrid power system supplying the entire resort (with up to 150 guests and staff and the main amenities you expect from a low-key resort) is predominantly run on solar energy.  There is no naturally-occurring fresh water on the island so all water for the kitchen, showers, hand basins and for drinking is seawater that goes through a desalinisation process.  All food has to brought over from the mainland, some waste is processed on location and used on the runway (if I remember correctly) and some of it has to be periodically taken off the island – so waste minimisation is emphasised.   The entire set-up was impressive and the innovative solutions to overcoming the unique challenges presented by this setting were inspiring.  However, Peter was very honest about the need to balance the achieving sustainability and protecting the reef and the island with the financial reality of the business.  His somewhat unconventional business approach centring on trust, relationships and the sharing of knowledge (rather than keeping ‘trade secrets’ close to your chest) was refreshing.

The benefits of the revegetation for the natural world was obvious with the abundant and huge variety of nesting seabirds.  (There was a moment though, where two of us, somewhat lost in the winding paths in the middle of the island, surrounded by birds were sure this was a perfect setting for a horror movie – a la Hitchcock).  Lady Elliot Island is also located in a highly protected area of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and the diving and snorkelling was spectacular.  I swam with a plethora of turtles (including witnessing a particularly intimate moment between two of them :p), a huge manta ray, some sharks, octopi, cuttlefish, a massive cowtail stingray, a bunch of beautiful fish and coral and I could go on….


But even more fun than the ocean activities (pretty hard to beat…) was developing bonds with the other GCSP participants.  Like all good team bonding our relationships were built through loads of laughter, some embarrassing incidents, card games, stories and, of course, wine. While there was a lot of fun, hilarity and ‘non-academic’ conversation I was struck by the level of engaging conversation I had with all the scholars and I learned something new from everyone that I spoke with.  These conversations also gave us a chance to talk candidly about our work and I gained some awesome fieldwork ideas to incorporate into my research.  Relationships make the world go round….if I’ve learned anything in my career so far it’s that who you know is just as important as what you know.

This experience, on this unique, beautiful island, reinforced for me where my research fits within the wider climate change picture.  The magnitude of the issue is clear and the many different facets of climate change were highlighted.  It also made clear how easy it is to become ‘siloed’ in our focus and thinking. It’s useful to recognise that we need people working on all these aspects of climate change (eg. Reef and marine conservation, health, water security, food security etc) but it’s also useful to see the big picture, how all these pieces fit together and how we can do a better job of addressing the issue with inter-disciplinary collaboration in order to exploit synergies in our work and minimise or avoid duplication of efforts.

Now please excuse me while I go do some yoga or HIIT to try and make up for 4 days of second breakfasts and multiple dessert helpings – #nobuffetcontrol

#phdlife #climatechangeisreal

Meditating your way to a calmer Phd.

Today I am re-committing to a daily meditation practice.

Many of you know that I double as a yoga teacher and meditation goes hand-in-hand with yoga.  (In fact, the main purpose of a physical yoga practice, asana, is to prepare your body physically for long periods of sitting in meditation).  Over the years I have had a fluctuating meditation practice, but, I do know that I feel better when I meditate regularly.  I am able to make better decisions, have more clarity of mind and am able to handle stress with much more grace than I have been lately!  But recently I have found myself saying, more often than not, that I do not have time to meditate.

It is becoming increasingly acknowledged that PhD students often experience high levels of anxiety and stress (some blog posts here and here) and I can see why – it is quite the juggling act, can be a very isolating process and not everyone gets a lot of support from supervisors (I’m lucky!) and colleagues.  Meditation is one technique that can help to experience a much calmer (and more enjoyable) PhD candidature.  (For serious anxiety or depression it is important to consult a professional – try your university student support or Lifeline).

There is more and more research on the benefits of meditation and I could use this blog post to review and critique the literature and try and convince you with scientific evidence that meditation is a good idea.  But I’m not going to do that (and not just because it feels like work :p).  I think that the benefits of meditation are best demonstrated through experiential learning.  So it’s time to sit still and just be.

How do I meditate?

First you need to find a (fairly) quiet space – I am lucky enough to live only 2 minutes walk from home and my office is usually just me – but even a nice outdoor spot in a park can work (I have taken a nap in the middle of the Great Court at UQ St Lucia and meditated at a train station in Sydney – public spaces are fine!).  Then find a comfortable sitting position.  Ideally your hips are above your knees, so sit on a cushion if you can, but even sitting in your office chair will work well.

It is important to set a timer so you don’t worry about drifting off for too long.  I usually meditate for 15-20 minutes but you do not have to do that long.  CONSISTENCY is key – it’s going to be more beneficial to do 5 minutes a day seven days a week than 15 minutes a day sporadically.

There are many different meditation techniques and I’m a bit of meditation-whore – I like to mix it up!  So experiment – find the one that works for you (google is your friend).  Since my 10-day Vipassana meditation retreat last year I am partial to that technique but if your mind is particularly wild when you sit to meditate or you are new to meditation simply counting your breaths is a simple and effective practice.  Close  the eyes, relax the shoulders, but draw the crown of the head so you’re not slumping.  And then on each exhale, starting at 10, count down to 1.  Once you reach 1, start again at 10.  If you find your mind is drifting and you’ve lost count just gently draw the attention back to the breath and start at 10 again.

So many of my friends and students tell me ‘I can’t meditate.  My mind just won’t stay still’.  And that is part of the practice!  My mind constantly wanders, some days more frantically than others, but it is the practice of becoming aware of what your mind is doing, where it goes and then re-focussing the attention.  Some days I’ll spend the whole session writing a piece in my head – as much as I try to bring the attention back to the breath it keeps returning to that piece of work.  And sometimes (not all the time) I let it.

I find that if I meditate regularly the hours I spend not meditating (everything minus the 15 minutes of sitting still) are more productive and more calm.